Review Squad
Your project is about to ship. Instead of one reviewer catching what they catch, Review Squad dispatches a panel — security analyst, UX critic, performance specialist, pedantic nitpicker — each doing deep parallel analysis and reporting back.
Installation
/plugin marketplace add 2389-research/claude-plugins
/plugin install review-squad@2389-researchSkills
| Skill | What it does | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
review-squad:experts | Expert audit panel (SEO, a11y, security, perf, etc.) | Before launch — catch what you missed |
review-squad:normies | First-time visitors across a sophistication spectrum | When you can't tell if your site makes sense to outsiders |
review-squad:regulars | Task-oriented users verifying real flows work | Smoke test signup, checkout, search — the flows that matter |
review-squad:well-actually | Pedantic nitpickers finding what pros skip | Before posting to HN — find the nits before they do |
Quick Examples
Expert audit before launch:
User: "Run a review-squad:experts audit on my site before we go live"
Claude: I'd suggest this panel for your site:
- Security analyst — auth flows, data handling, headers
- Performance specialist — load times, bundle size, caching
- SEO reviewer — meta tags, structured data, crawlability
- Accessibility auditor — screen readers, contrast, keyboard nav
Approve this panel, or swap anyone out?
[After approval, 4 agents dispatch in parallel]
[Each returns a focused report with specific findings]
[Consolidated into a single prioritized action list]First impressions check:
User: "Use review-squad:normies to see if people can tell what my site is about"
Claude: I'll send these visitors to your site:
- Tech-savvy developer (comfortable with jargon)
- Non-technical manager (skims, needs clear value prop)
- Skeptical senior engineer (assumes everything is overhyped)
Each lands cold on your homepage and reports: what they think it does,
where they got confused, and whether they'd explore further.Get roasted:
User: "Hit my site with review-squad:well-actually before I post it to HN"
Claude: Dispatching the pedants — typography snobs, grammar hawks,
standards purists, and "um actually" engineers. They'll find the
things professional reviewers skip because they're too polite.How It Works
- You pick a skill (experts, normies, regulars, or well-actually)
- Claude proposes a panel — you approve or customize it
- Agents dispatch (parallel for experts, sequential for the others)
- Each agent reviews independently using their specific lens
- Results consolidate into a single report with actionable findings
Three of the four skills (normies, regulars, well-actually) use browser MCP tools, so you'll need a dev server running for those.
Documentation
If Review Squad caught something your tests didn't, a ⭐ helps us know it's landing.
Built by 2389 · Part of the Claude Code plugin marketplace